|
The
Levitical Offerings
THE
SIN & TRESPASS OFFERING
(Leviticus
5:1-6:7)
Introduction:
The
Sin and Trespass offerings are so together that there is
much confusion as to where to draw the line between the
two. For example: J. Sidlow Baxter in his Explore the
Book places the division at the beginning of Chapter
Five. Warren Wiersbe does likewise in his Expository
Outlines on the Old Testament as does R. B. Thieme in
Levitical Offerings. Clarence Larkin lumps the two
together and Harry Ironside, Lectures on Levitical
Offerings, Irving Jensen, Leviticus a Self-Study Guide
and Andrew Bonar, A Commentary on the Book of Leviticus
make the split at Chapter (5:14).
Some of
the Differences suggested:
[1].
The in offering deals with sins done in ignorance
while the trespass offering deals with known sins.
[2]. The Sin offering has to do with the fact
that man has a sin nature, while the trespass offering
is f or sinful acts.
[3]. One author uses (1 Tim. 2:13-15) as an
example of the difference: Adam sinned deliberately
(trespass offering) while Eve was deceived.
[4]. Another says that offerings picture the
two sides of the death of Christ, one for the sin
nature of man and one for his sins.
[5]. The trespass offering apparently requires
restitution where the sin offering does not.
Much of this
depends on where the division is made.
Some
questions that need an answer:
[1].
If the sin offering is for sins of ignorance, what
does (Lev. 15:15) mean?
[2]. If the division is made at (5:1), why are
there two offerings in (Chapter 5? 5:6 &
5:15).
[3]. What is the difference between a trespass
and a sin? (Eph. 2:1, Lev. 5:15,16) Are they
separable.
[4]. If it is true that the sin offering deals
with basic sin nature and the trespass offering deals
with overt or covert acts, can you separate the two?
Can a man have a sin nature and never sin?
[5]. Since there is such a difference of
opinion concerning the division why is it that no one
mentions it.
I. The
Trespass Offering -
We
will assume that the division point is at the beginning
of chapter 5, verse six is certainly the strongest
argument for taking this position and probably rightly
so. If this is true then there are apparently two types
of offerings under this category:
[1].
(Lev. 5:1-13)
[2]. (Lev. 5:14-19)
The first of
these two apparently deals with sins of negligence,
fraud, omission, violations of personal rights, failures
to keep promises, and taking an oath to harm or do evil
to someone (see Acts 23:12ff). These are apparently
willful and knowledgeable acts.
The second
group falls again in the ignorance category as did those
in the sin offering of chapter four. These acts done in
ignorance, require a different object of sacrifice, a
ram. There is also a financial obligation connected with
it. (vs. 15)
Let us
look at the two offerings:
A.
(Lev. 5:1-13)
[1].
Sin, Oaths, Failure
(a).
(vs. 1) s in of concealment.
(b). (vs. 2,3) Sins of uncleanness.
(c). (vs. 4) Oaths jeopardizing the welfare of
another (malice of forethought.).
(d). (vs. 4) failure to keep a promise.
[2].
Confession is required before he is to present his
offering.
[3]. There are a number of acceptable
offerings, again dictated by the individuals financial
well being.
(a).
A female from the flock, a lamb or a kid of a goat.
(vs. 6)
(b). Two turtledoves, or two young pigeons (vs.
7)
(c). The tenth part of the ephah of fine flour (vs.
11)
B.
(Lev. 5:14-19)
[1].
The sacrifice is a ram. (Gen. 22:13)
[2]. An estimation of the worth of the animal
had to be taken and the offender had to not only bring
the ram but also 1/5th or 20% of its worth as a
penalty. (vs. 15,16) This is making amends.
[3]. Verse 17 declares that the individual is
guilty even in his ignorance.
[4]. Verse 19 declares that his sin is a sin
against the Lord. (see Gen. 39:9; Ps. 51:4; Gen. 20:6;
2 Sam. 12:9,13)
[5]. No alternate sacrifices are
offered.
II.
Restitution - (Lev. 6:1-7)
A.
Four categories of violations are found in these verses
requiring, to make Restitution:
[1].
Refusal to return something to a neighbor which had
been deposited for safe keeping; i.e. defrauding (vs.
2)
[2]. Oppression of others. (vs. 2)
[3]. Cheating or stealing at the expense of
someone else. (vs. 2)
[4]. Defraudation of property through
falsehood or misrepresentation. (vs. 3)
B.
The means of Restitution:
[1].
"restore the principal" (vs. 5) Give back the property
or item in question.
[2]. He must add the fifth part, so that the
one who was offended receives interest on his
temporary loss. (vs. 5)
[3]. Then he had to bring the ram for his
trespass offering, one without blemish.
[4]. He had to present the silver to 1/5th the
ram's estimated worth.
III.
Practical Lessons -
A.
One who is knowledgeable of a crime and hides it, is an
accessory to the fact (5:1).
B.
Associations with evil or compromise is a sin. (5:2,3) If
you fellowship with sin, you partake of it.
C.
Broken promises constitute a form of fraud.
(5:4)
D.
Confession precedes forgiveness - (5:5) (1 Jn. 1:9; Ps.
32:5; 38:18; 2 Cor. 13:5; Lev. 5:5).
E.
The Lord makes forgiveness available to all.
(5:6-13)
F.
Forgiveness is not complete until amendment is made or at
least intended. (5:16)
G.
Sins of ignorance bear the same guilt as those who sin
knowingly - (5:15)
H.
All sin is a direct affront to our Lord - (5:19) Gen.
39:9; 2 Sam. 12:9,13.
I.
Sin costs you a lot, more than its worth,
(6:1-7)
Back
To Index
|